BOOK REVIEW: A Brief History of Nakedness

I stumbled into this book quite by accidentHistory of Nakedness, as I was looking for a substantive answer as to why Americans have so many hang ups when it comes to the topic of nudity.  I have wondered – for years – why so many of our friends, some of whom have all but disavowed organized religion (let alone conservative fundamentalism), are completely spooked by the concept that we have a deep passion for family naturist recreation.

“Aren’t you worried about….  you know…  stuff?!

In his Brief History of Nakedness, Philip Carr-Gomm presents a neatly organized chronology of the ever-evolving social perceptions about nudity, blowing rather effortlessly through two millennia of religious doctrine, pagan rituals, and various tangential witch hunts for naked people, all of which finally culminate in the various trends related to (in)decent exposure in the early 21st century.  It’s gets a little chewy when you’re tying to sort out the cross pollination between the religious traditions of the early Christians, Hindus, and Druids – but the fact is, that’s pretty much the score.  There are a lot of reasons why people fear nakedness; some religious, some political, some sociological – but in the end, it’s one big tangly yarn of confusion.  But I dare say, few people can actually articulate why an exposed nipple is more offensive than live footage of genocide on the 6 o’clock news.

I think the author makes a compelling and thought provoking case, based largely on centuries of what most would call political, religious, and gender-biased oppression.  It’s something of a let down that all this hoo-hah about the “nudist colony” down the road might actually come down to the fear that one man’s penis is simply locked in a power struggle with another woman’s breast, but in the end, it seems that may well be the case.

And, personally, I also appreciated that Carr-Gomm took the leap into the shark-infested waters, suggesting that there might be an element of sexuality in the realm of social nudity.  His parting shot related to the need “to see and be seen” resonated deeply with me, well documented in his writing in that he truly came to understand his research on nakedness when he, himself, engaged in social nudity.  It was perhaps the best rebuttal to the tiresome “nudity does not equate sex” banter that I have seen.  Forthright, but steeped in real perceptions of the mainstream public.  Not just the idealist doctrine inherent of “hardcore naturist propaganda.” (My words, not his!)  I’m truly grateful for those who stand up to defend our civil liberties, and the tireless efforts of groups like the Naturist Action Committee, but it worries me that despite these efforts, Americans seem to be regressing toward a level puritanical paranoia and intolerance that has turned public ideals of family naturism into sexual deviance!  The author’s matter-of-fact chronology does well in setting the stage as to how we may have painted ourselves into this corner, and how those defining moments of naked proclamation are perceived by the average person on the street.

Perhaps most intriguing of all is reading the Amazon.com reviews of the Kindle edition, which happens to be the edition I read.  Most readers commended the author for his succinct account of the evolution of the naked condition, but two or three reviewers gave the author low marks due to the fact that the Kindle edition is published without the photographs included in the printed edition.  Really?  You’re going to download a scholarly book about nudity in search of images of naked humans?  Aren’t there better options to be found on the internet for that sort of thing?  Once again, additional evidence of the very confusion and controversy that surrounds the issue in the first place.

In the end, even though I consider myself to be an educated and thoughtful (meaning one who thinks a lot) person, I found myself quite absorbed in the complexity of it all, leading me to believe that the wholesale acceptance of the naturist movement might not occur during my lifetime, or maybe… ever.  I don’t know if this means that naturists are simply a wiser breed, ahead of their time in the psycho/sociological scheme of things, or if we’re simply collective freaks of nature who will never quite find a place in mainstream culture.  But it’s rare that you see such a well written attempt to explain the entire phenomenon.  I suspect I’ll be reflecting upon Mr. Carr-Gomm’s research for a long time; in particular, every time I get naked!

10 thoughts on “BOOK REVIEW: A Brief History of Nakedness

  1. Happy Bare says:

    This looks really interesting. I will order it.

    Like

  2. Reblogged this on clothes free life and commented:
    Book review of definitive text on nudity and nakedness

    Like

  3. Danee says:

    Enjoyed this, and reposted on internationalyn.org reading section.

    Like

    • Naturist Dan says:

      Thanks Danee. Just checking out internationalyn.org and thought about registering, though I don’t quite meet the “young naturist” criteria.

      Impressive project! Thank you for your fine work.

      Like

  4. Reblogged this on Naturist Holidays in Europe and commented:
    Very interesting !

    Like

  5. Antandrian says:

    I’m encouraged to buy it; I fancy having the hard copy so I can read it on the train to and from work – I will relish the looks from other passengers.

    The general worldwide correlation between settled civilisation including nuclear families and requirement/expectation to be clothed suggests to me that nudity, which of course entails display/exposure of the human genitals, is too confronting and distracting in the context of such a society, compared to in small bands of hunter-gatherers, when you consider the highly sexually charged mind of the adult human male in particular. General public nudity in the context of a populous and urbanised society would invite sexual chaos, which would be inimical, antithetical to ordered, stable society, and I think that is the fundamental basis of gymnophobia. The version of public nudity practised by modern-day, “official” club-member nudists involves a high degree of personal restraint and self discipline with respect to sexual attraction and indulgence, which could not be expected to be maintained by the whole population of a settled civilisation if nudity was tolerated or the norm.

    Like

    • Naturist Dan says:

      Thanks for your thoughtful response. I largely agree with you, and I think you’d find the book an interesting read as clearly, the author is grappling with much of the very same social dichotomy. (Is it a dichotomy, or simply a conundrum?)

      Hope you turn a few heads on the train!

      Like

  6. […] be as innocent as purported… by naturists… to be. I refer, once more, to Philip Carr-Gomm (A Brief History of Nakedness, 2010) where he quotes Pope John Paul II, “Nakedness itself is not immodest… Immodesty is […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s